Kincaid’s A Small Place brings a certain level of rawness to the world of literature. Not only
does one become keenly aware of the dynamics between the tourist and the
native, the colonized and colonizer, the have and the have-notes, but one also
becomes aware of the power relations of the world, from a global and historical
perspective. Kincaid rightfully showcases the absurdities in modern-day
Antiguan government, while also making somewhat harsh critiques on the Antiguan
people. I enjoyed the lack of inhibitions with which Kincaid writes, the
scathing critiques she puts forth against the Western world (the tourist, whiteness,
racism, colonialism, as well as Antiguans in positions of power), and the
genius analogies she makes plain of colonialism and racism. One immediately
senses the immense rage that is writhing beneath the surface of this short,
simply and plainly written book. Being able to write with through that level of
pain is nothing short of an amazing accomplishment; writing one’s experience
and speaking her truth is nothing short of revolutionary and a triumph.
In one of the latter chapters, she questioningly laments on
her fellow Antiguans in such a way that I find saddening: “I look at this place (Antigua), I look at these people (Antiguans),
and I cannot tell whether I was brought up by, and so come from, children,
eternal innocents, or artists who have not yet found eminence in a world too
stupid to understand, or lunatics who have made their own lunatic asylum, or an
exquisite combination of all three. (p. 57)”. Here, I wonder whether or not
Kincaid, when writing this, did not reach the height of her frustration with
her people. In an interview with Kincaid, quite some years after A Small Place had been published, she
said one of the issues most Antiguans had with her book was not that it was
untrue on any level, but rather they questioned why she felt the need to state
it at all. In other words, the agreed with everything she had to say, but didn’t
think she needed to write it for the public/world to know. They felt, in a
sense, that she was “airing dirty laundry”. I see this sentiment in a number of
colonized communities in which one who tells of the issues of the community, of
their suffering, of their realities, of their histories – is more criticized by
those she seeks to liberate than those who one is seeking liberation from. In the
U.S. African American community, Black feminists were lauded by the Black
community a number of times for supposedly “airing dirty laundry”. But,
relating it to our discussions on “silencing”, it is important to note the ways
in which silencing is also maintained and sustained by those that have and are
actively being silenced. Understanding colonialism means understanding that
many a times, the colonized become the biggest ally for colonialism. I think
this is the frustration Kincaid was speaking to in the excerpt, as well as the
entire book.
No comments:
Post a Comment