Identities are not fixed, nor are
they easily defined. Terms like “American”, for example, mean different things
to each person who uses it as a part of their identity. This was true of the
marines who went to Haiti during the Occupation. The only thing they all had in
common was their whiteness, Americanness, and being marines, which united them
against the strange—to them—and sometimes frightening country and culture they
were going into. The presence of immigrants and the children of immigrants, who
had experienced “Americanization” processes through history lessons, patriotic
lessons, pageants/ceremonies, derogation of immigrant customs, and etc. must
have not only made “American” more difficult to define, but also, influenced
the ways individual marines interacted with Haitian culture and citizens. The
fear of losing their identities and becoming like the Haitians, of joining
their way(s) of life seemed very strong. The lines had to be very clearly
drawn. The marines were men; the Haitians were non-men, even the males. The
marines were the fathers, or at times, wise older brothers, and the Haitians
were the children and younger siblings, benefiting from their guidance.
This fluidity of identity reminded
me a bit of Freedom Papers. The
identities of that family changed constantly, at least outwardly. Acquiring new
documents, losing or destroying old ones, leaving one country for another, all could
change their identity, and if French citizenship papers are enough to change
one’s citizenship status in spite of publicly claiming U.S. citizenship
previously, how much more fragile might a person’s identity be living for years
in a new country?
The paternalism displayed by the
marines and in the writing supporting the Occupation sounds very similar to the
ways we—the general, blanket we, as “Americans” talk about people from Third
World countries, and it reminded me a lot of the need to “save” Third World
women. The marines saw the Haitians culture as primitive; they needed to
civilize them and bring them into the modern age. While some of the
“improvements” they made may not have been unnecessary or unwanted—who would
argue a hospital or sewer system are bad things in and of themselves?—the ways
they went about making the improvements made them so.
The ways marines interacted with
Haitian women reminded me of “Making Empires Respectable.” The rape and abuse
of women in both situations is obvious, but the absence of white women and
respectable white households and gender relations being cast as one of the
reasons why marines in Haiti were experiencing a moral breakdown. When European
women were brought into the colonies, they were supposed to maintain the moral
standards of the European community. Before and without their presence, such
standards weren’t nearly as important.
No comments:
Post a Comment